Back to the case archive

File 2016/010, Documented event

Internet Research Agency campaign

St. Petersburg, Russia, 2013–2018

Case summary

The St. Petersburg-based Internet Research Agency (IRA) ran networks of fake accounts producing polarising content, most prominently around the 2016 US election cycle. The operation was documented in extraordinary detail by the Mueller indictment, Senate Intelligence Committee reports and platform data releases, making it the reference case of disinformation research.

Timeline

  1. 2013-07IRA operations were established at 55 Savushkina Street, St. Petersburg.
  2. 2015-06Adrian Chen's investigation 'The Agency' ran in NYT Magazine.
  3. 2016-11Fake-account networks peaked ahead of the US election.
  4. 2018-02-16The Mueller inquiry indicted the IRA and 13 individuals.
  5. 2018-12Independent analyses for the Senate (New Knowledge, Oxford) laid the platform data open.
  6. 2023-07After Prigozhin's death the IRA was reported shut; successor networks remain tracked.

People and connections

  • Internet Research AgencyOrganisation

    The 'troll factory'; the indictment's main corporate subject.

  • Yevgeny PrigozhinPerson

    Charged as financier; acknowledged the operation in 2023.

  • Savushkina 55Place

    The operation's documented address.

  • Blacktivist / Heart of TexasObject

    Examples of the highest-engagement fake pages.

  • Yevgeny Prigozhin to Internet Research AgencyFunding via Concord companies (indictment)
  • Internet Research Agency to Blacktivist / Heart of TexasOpposing-identity pages run from the same operator pool

Findings

Every finding lists its source and date. Interpretation stays in the researcher's note.

  • The IRA's existence, address, staffing and content volume are verified by the indictment and platform data.

    VerifiedSource: DOJ and Senate reports2018–2019
  • Records show that the campaign produced content for both sides, including opposing rally calls from the same office.

    VerifiedSource: Senate report, Vol. 22019-10
  • The campaign's net effect on the election result is unmeasured; the reach-versus-impact distinction is debated in the literature.

    ContestedSource: Academic literature2023
  • Claims of one-to-one continuity between successor networks (e.g. Doppelgänger) and IRA staff are partly documented, partly analytic inference.

    ProbableSource: EU DisinfoLab and platform reports2024

Documents

Sources

  1. United States v. Internet Research Agency (indictment)

    US Department of Justice, 2018, Official indictment

    Open source
  2. Senate Intel Committee Report, Volume 2: Russia's Use of Social Media

    US Senate, 2019, Official committee report

    Open source
  3. The Agency

    NYT Magazine (Adrian Chen), 2015, Field investigation

    Open source
  4. The Tactics & Tropes of the IRA

    New Knowledge / Senate, 2018, Data-analysis report

    Open source

Locations

  • 55 Savushkina St, St. Petersburg59.99°, 30.24°

Researcher's note

Interpretation: the core skill this file teaches is reading scale: millions of impressions look impressive, but impact analysis demands a different kind of evidence. No conclusion sentence should bridge the gap between reach figures and behavioural change without data.

Recent checks

  1. 2026-06-11Successor-network reports reviewed; finding confidence levels unchanged.